China Saw $11.4 Billion in Crypto-Based Capital Flight Last Year
China Saw $11.4 Billion in Crypto-Based Capital Flight Last Year
On January 8, China-based blockchain security firm Peckshield published its “2019 Global Digital Asset AML Research Report” noting a variety of crypto trends throughout the year. According to the study, cryptocurrency-based capital flight stemming from China was around $11.4 billion in 2019. Peckshield’s research recorded a number of illegal or otherwise unregulated transactions over the last few years.
Also Read: Mining Report Highlights China’s ASIC Manufacturing Improvements and Dominance International Unregulated Capital Flow Using Cryptocurrencies Surges in 2019, While China Saw $11.4 Billion in Capital Flight Crypto Transactions
In January 2017, the Chinese government and the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) banned domestic cryptocurrency exchange operations. However, despite the ban, Chinese citizens have been able to access digital assets via over-the-counter platforms and offshore exchanges. Peckshield, a blockchain research firm from China, published a report which shows Chinese residents are still leveraging cryptos on a regular basis.
According to the study, roughly $11.4 billion in capital flight crypto transactions derived from China. The number is less than 2018’s $17.9 billion but more than 2017’s $10.1 billion. 2019’s unregulated capital flows from China represent more than 1% of the country’s foreign exchange reserves. Peckshield’s study notes: International unregulated capital flows: The flow of funds using digital assets as a carrier has been huge internationally, but the legal definition of digital assets such as bitcoin in different countries is still very vague, meaning that these liquid funds have not been reasonably regulatory compliance. MLM Crypto Scams and Darknet Market Bitcoins
Peckshield’s research utilized full nodes from a variety of blockchains and parsed the public data storage files deriving from chains like BTC, ETH, EOS, and TRX in real-time. The study also highlighted the major multi-level-marketing crypto scams that plagued China and many other regions worldwide. Peckshield mentioned how the Ponzi Onecoin managed to siphon $4 billion before the scam ended. The study also emphasized the Plustoken project which managed to defraud Chinese and international investors by running away with more than 200,000 BTC, 780,000 ETH, and 26 million EOS. Peckshield’s research notes that 3 million people were scammed by Plustoken and “the impact is very wide and the damage is huge.”
In addition to detailing the capital flow from Chinese citizens using cryptocurrencies, Peckshield’s report discusses darknet market (DNM) bitcoin growth. Peckshield claims there are about 60,000 darknet websites running on the invisible web and DNM transactions spiked considerably in 2019. In 2018, Peckshield data shows that 334,329 BTC flowed into DNMs but the following year the number jumped to 546,825 BTC.
Peckshield’s deep web research stressed the firm analyzed DNM page structures, content, and discovered a large number of digital asset addresses used within the invisible web. Out of the 546,000 BTC, Peckshield discovered that the total number of BTC flowing directly from DNMs into major exchanges was 29,471 BTC. The study emphasizes that only a small fraction of DNM funds flows into major trading platforms but small amounts of DNM funds are sent to exchanges every single day.
Peckshield’s report has five separate chapters of comprehensive crypto data in regard to DNM money flow and capital flight from an array of countries like China. The researchers note that overall BTC circulation on the invisible web is growing but it’s a “relatively stable amount determined by market demand.” On the other hand, “the current unregulated asset flow has occupied a considerable market share.” In Peckshield’s opinion, “accelerating compliance has become an urgent matter” as far as the global digital asset environment is concerned.
What do you think about the capital flight leveraging cryptocurrencies in China? What do you think about Peckshield’s data in regard to DNM funds in 2019? Let us know what you think about these topics in the comments section below.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any ideas, software, mining rigs, mining rig manufacturers, websites, concepts, content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
Image credits: Shutterstock, Peckshield’s research, Wiki Commons, Fair Use, and Pixabay.
Did you know you can earn BTC and BCH through Bitcoin Mining? If you already own hardware, connect it to our powerful Bitcoin mining pool. If not, you can easily get started through one of our flexible Bitcoin cloud mining contracts.
Share this story: Tags in this story $11.4 billion, AML, BCH, Bitcoin, bitcoin cash, BTC, capital flight, China, China Capital Flow, crypto AML report, Crypto Ponzis, Darknet Markets, Digital Assets, DNM, DNM Funds, DNM revenues, EOS, ETH, Invisible Web, MLM, Onecoin, Peckshield, Plustoken, Ponzi, Regulation, tron, trx Related Low Interest Rates Provide Precarious Protection Against Crisis, World Bank Warns ECONOMICS | Lubomir Tassev
The latest global debt wave is the largest in the past five decades, the World Bank has acknowledged in a… read more. Bailouts From Asia to the EU Signal Recession and Potential Crypto Opportunity ECONOMICS | Graham Smith
China"s Hengfeng Bank is set to get a $14.2 billion bailout from both Chinese government and foreign investors. An emergency… read more. Jamie Redman
Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.Bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.