Fun

Mango Markets DAO buyback plan leads to accusations of ‘self-dealing’

News Feed - 2024-05-06 10:05:00

Christopher Roark11 hours agoMango Markets DAO buyback plan leads to accusations of ‘self-dealing’Mango DAO distributed treasury funds to token holders through a buyback program, but critics claim it was done to benefit an FTX estate buyer.312 Total viewsListen to article 0:00InvestigationOwn this piece of crypto historyCollect this article as NFTJoin us on social networksAn April 7 plan to buy back tokens at a premium to market price has led to controversy within the governing body of decentralized finance protocol Mango Markets. 


Some community members claimed that the buyback was orchestrated to benefit the buyer of the FTX estate’s stash of MNGO tokens. These tokens were transferred from FTX to an anonymous account only a few days before the plan was proposed, implying that they may have been purchased as part of an over-the-counter deal.


Critics of the plan accused its originator, DonDuala, of being connected to the FTX buyer. DonDuala did not comment on this accusation within the Discord forum. 


Other members supported the plan, claiming it made sense for the organization to purchase MNGO tokens even if it benefited the mysterious FTX estate buyer. Supporters contended that the MNGO token is underpriced in the market and, therefore, should be repurchased as a way of distributing profits to investors. An amended version of the buyback plan was approved on April 24. 


Mango Markets is a Web3 app that allows crypto users to borrow and lend out various cryptocurrencies. It runs on the Solana network and is governed by MNGO tokenholders, who collectively form its governing body, the decentralized autonomous organization Mango DAO. 


The protocol was exploited for $116 million via a flash loan attack in October 2022, and its token price is down by more than 25% over its preexploit value, according to data from CoinMarketCap.Don Duala makes a token buyback proposal


On April 7, Mango DAO member DonDuala posted a proposal to its forum on Discord. DonDuala suggested that the DAO should buy back 275 million MNGO from its current holders, thereby reducing the token’s circulating supply. In exchange, the DAO should offer holders 9.995 million of the Dai (DAI) stablecoin derivative CHAI, valued at approximately $10.7 million. This implied a buyback price of $0.032 per MNGO token. The price of MNGO on April 7 was $0.02324, according to CoinMarketCap, over 27% less than the implied buyback price.Mango DAO buyback proposal. Source: Mango Markets, Discord


To facilitate this exchange, the DAO would issue options tokens that could be exercised by individual holders. To prevent the tokens from being distributed to exchanges and other automated systems, only accounts that participated in the proposal’s vote would receive the options.Community discovers mysterious FTX “buyer”


On April 11, DAO member Donderper discovered that a mysterious account had received MNGO from the estate of bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, and that this account was now using these tokens to vote in favor of the buyback proposal. “Holy shit,” Donderper exclaimed. “Did FTX estate just enter the chat?” They posted a screenshot reportedly showing the account voting in favor of the proposal. At the time, it represented 6.67% of the total votes cast. Donderper notices FTX buyer vote. Source: Mango Markets, Discord


Donderper suggested that the actions of this account were “shady,” stating: “[A] week before this proposal starts being talked about FTX estate starts transferring out all 333 million of its tokens into an account that gets used in this vote.” They speculated that “someone cut a deal with FTX for to buy their mngo for [$0.01]” and then made a proposal to have the DAO buy it back for $0.038. They claimed that the account may be poised to make $2 million in net profit by selling half of its coins.


Donderper did not post any evidence of the price at which the alleged over-the-counter trade took place. Blockchain data shows only that a known FTX account transferred the tokens to a different account.


Some community members began to imply that DonDuala and another DAO member, Maximilian, may be affiliated with the FTX-related account. “Wow, this is super shady. @DonDuala / @Maximilian,” one member stated, asking, “Are you aware who controls this account?” Another member responded, “They 100% know,” calling the transfer “a backdoor deal.”Comment from Mango DAO participants. Source: Mango markets, Discord


In a post later that day, DonDuala sidestepped the question of whether they were affiliated with the FTX buyer and instead responded to criticism of the proposal. DonDuala stated that the focus on the FTX buyer seemed to be a distraction from the core issue at stake in the proposal. “Understandably there’s a lot of dislike for FTX and the way the estate handled the liquidation proceedings,” they stated, “but today’s uproar in response to those tokens voting seem misplaced.”


DonDuala argued that the proposal should pass because it represented support for “market efficiency.” They stated, “No votes are a vote against market efficiency, yes votes defend the token while preserving optionality that the DAO continues on its best footing.”


Related:Mango Markets hires representative to handle US regulatory scrutinyThe proposal fails and is resurrected


On April 12, the initial proposal was voted down, with 52.3% of tokens being used to vote against it. DonDuala then resubmitted the proposal with amendments. In the new version, the DAO would buy back only 156 million MNGO, slightly more than half of what the original proposal had suggested. In addition, options would be distributed to all users who had deposited into Mango DAO’s Realm governance system, regardless of whether they participated in the vote for this particular proposal.


On April 20, Mango Markets co-founder Daffy Durairaj posted a lengthy argument against the new proposal’s passage. Durairaj claimed that DonDuala and Maximilian were being “completely mercenary” and were “willing to say and do whatever in order to improve their financial position.” Through private conversations, Durairaj had learned that “there is a large amount of money at stake and they don’t intend to negotiate.” He claimed that the two of them were engaged in “untrustworthy behavior and self-dealing” and that “these behaviors are by themselves reasons to vote against this proposal.”


Durairaj suggested that the DAO could support the token price through other means once the proposal was defeated but argued that this particular buyback proposal should not be accepted.Daffy Durairaj’s comment on the buyback plan. Source: Mango Markets, DiscordThe amended proposal passes


On April 21, Duala formally posted the new version of the proposal to the Realms voting system. On April 24, it passed, with over 67.9% of tokens being used to vote in favor of it.Second buyback proposal passes. Source: Mango DAO on Realms


On April 30, Duala announced that 46.67% of the options had been exercised, resulting in the DAO buying back approximately 73 million MNGO for 2.3 million CHAI.Results of buyback, as reported by DonDuala. Source: Mango Markets, Discord


The same day, DonDuala stated that they would make a new proposal to spend one-eighth of the DAO’s treasury in May to buy back additional MNGO at a price of 5% below the estimated book value.


In response to the buyback, some members took to social media to complain. “Mango DAO is COOKED,” X user Kevin stated, adding that “some shady actors made a buyback proposal that [...] soft rugs passive token holders.” After this proposal failed, “they came back with cosmetic changes and voted it through.”


X user Frank Ronson pushed back against this claim, asking rhetorically, “What’s wrong with exiting at book value?” Ronson claimed that people “shouldn’t be held captive to a protocol that won’t buy back to match book value.” 


When a company’s market cap falls below its book value, investors sometimes buy up its shares, take control of the company and liquidate it. Investopedia refers to these investors as “corporate raiders.” According to the Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute, corporate raiding is legal in the United States, but poison pill and regulatory taxes often make the raids unprofitable.


Related:AAVE DAO debates reimbursement plan for AMPL depositors


On April 18, Avrham Eisenberg was found guilty of fraud for carrying out the Mango Markets exploit. His sentencing is scheduled for July 29. On April 26, court documents revealed that he was also charged with possession of child pornography.# Business# DAO# DeFiAdd reaction

News Feed

Meta, Microsoft, and Others Launch Metaverse Standards Group
Meta, Microsoft, and Others Launch Metaverse Standards Group Meta, Microsoft, and 31 more companies have united to form an organization to promote the creation of open standards re
William Suberg57 minutes agoInordinately high — Bitcoin Ordinals send BTC transaction fees to new 5-month peakBitcoin users attempting to send on-chain BTC transactions are footing the bill for a fresh surge in Ordinal
Marathon Patent Group Buys $150 Million Worth of Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset
Marathon Patent Group Buys $150 Million Worth of Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset Marathon Patent Group announced Monday that it bought 4,813 bitcoins in a deal worth
ETH/BTC’s 8-Year Cycle Chart Shows How High Ethereum Price Can Go This Cycle
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Recent analysis suggests that the Ethereum pricemay be operating on an 8-year cycle, diverging from Bitcoin’s esta
Robbers Take $450K From a Tether Trader During an In-Person Transaction in Hong Kong — Second Incident in 2021
Robbers Take $450K From a Tether Trader During an In-Person Transaction in Hong Kong — Second Incident in 2021 Hong Kong police are investigating the second in
Shaquille O’Neal may still be in hot water over Astral NFTs, says judge
Jesse Coghlan7 hours agoShaquille O’Neal may still be in hot water over Astral NFTs, says judgeA Miami judge didn’t dismiss a claim that basketball legend Shaquille O’Neal was a “seller” of Astrals NFTs and fou
Swiss State Secretariat Helps Blockchain Incubator Firm Set Up Base in South Africa
Swiss State Secretariat Helps Blockchain Incubator Firm Set Up Base in South Africa Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) is reported
Gareth Jenkinson14 hours agoEthereum’s proto-danksharding to make rollups 10x cheaper — Consensys zkEVM Linea headConsensys zkEVM Linea head Nicolas Liochon says speed and execution will continue to increase as it tw
2020 Libertarian Presidential Candidate Jo Jorgensen Talks Bitcoin, Endless Wars, Covid-19 Response
2020 Libertarian Presidential Candidate Jo Jorgensen Talks Bitcoin, Endless Wars, Covid-19 ResponseOn June 8, news.Bitcoin.com chatted with the U.S. 2020 Libertarian candidate for p
Bitcoin could fall below $50K if Magnificent 7 stocks stage another $500 billion loss
Zoltan Vardai10 hours agoBitcoin could fall below $50K if Magnificent 7 stocks stage another $500 billion lossBitcoin could see more downward pressure if the top tech stocks in the US continue to shed value.2749 Total vi
Yashu Gola7 hours agoXRP price can fall 40% by September — Fractal analysisXRP is currently mirroring a trend from April–June 2021 that preceded the price falling by 65% in the following months.10680 Total views21 To
3air Leverages Blockchain Technology to Deliver Extensive Broadband Connectivity in Africa
3air Leverages Blockchain Technology to Deliver Extensive Broadband Connectivity in Africa sponsored The broadband internet connectivity platform, 3air, aims to bring seamless broad