US Seizes Previously Undetected Silk Road Bitcoins Worth Over $1 Billion
The U.S. government has seized over $1 billion in bitcoin from previously undetected transactions associated with the Silk Road marketplace and is now seeking the forfeiture of the cryptocurrency. US Confiscates $1 Billion in Bitcoin From Silk Road
The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit seeking the forfeiture of bitcoin currently worth over $1 billion that it seized on Tuesday, according to the court document. The Department of Justice said on Thursday that this bitcoin seizure is the largest the U.S. has ever made. The “Defendant Property” seized includes bitcoin and its forked coins, which were: Approximately 69,370.22491543 bitcoin (BTC), bitcoin gold (BTG), bitcoin SV (BSV), bitcoin cash (BCH), obtained from 1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbh.
Twitter bot @whale_alert flagged the transaction on Tuesday, leading to speculation of why the coins suddenly moved from the dormant wallet. Today, the mystery is solved as it was in fact law enforcement transferring the coins to a government-controlled wallet.
Following the DOJ’s announcement, blockchain data analytics firm Chainalysis explained that “Law enforcement agents used Chainalysis tools and investigative assistance to identify the largest cryptocurrency wallets with connections to Silk Road.” They analyzed “bitcoin transactions executed by Silk Road and identified 54 previously undetected bitcoin transactions representing the proceeds of unlawful activity. They also found that a hacker, known as Individual X, stole those funds from Silk Road,” the firm detailed. Funds seized by the U.S. government. Source: Chainalysis
The 54 transactions, worth 70,411.46 BTC, were sent from the Silk Road’s bitcoin addresses to two bitcoin addresses, the court document describes, adding that about 69,471.08 BTC were then sent to 1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx. The court document refers to this address as “1HQ3” for short.
From 1HQ3, 101 BTC were sent to BTC-e, the defunct Russian exchange. About 69,370 BTC remained in 1HQ3 and were subsequently seized by the government. The address also contains approximately 69,370 BCH, BTG, and BSV prior to the government’s seizure.
The court document claims that “Individual X, whose identity is known to the government” was in control of the 1HQ3 address. The DOJ alleges that this person “was able to hack into Silk Road and gain unauthorized and illegal access to Silk Road and thereby steal the illicit cryptocurrency from Silk Road and move it into wallets that Individual X controlled.”
The government further alleges that Silk Road marketplace founder Ross Ulbricht “became aware of Individual X’s online identity and threatened Individual X for return of the cryptocurrency to Ulbricht.” However, “Individual X did not return the cryptocurrency but kept it and did not spend it.” Ulbricht was convicted by a federal jury in February 2015 and given a double life sentence.
On Tuesday, Individual X signed a Consent and Agreement to Forfeiture with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of California, the court document continues, adding: On November 3, 2020, the United States took custody of the Defendant Property from 1HQ3.
What do you think about the U.S. government seizing $1 billion worth of bitcoin? Let us know in the comments section below. Bitcoin"s Market Cap Is More Valuable Than the IMF"s Special Drawing Rights Reserves NEWS | 59 mins ago $1 Billion Silk Road Bitcoin Moves for First Time in Five Years NEWS | 11 hours ago Tags in this story confiscate bitcoin, doj seizes bitcoin, justice department seize bitcoin, silk road bitcoin, Silk Road BTC, silk road hacker, us seizes bitcoin, us seizes btc
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Chainalysis Use Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash to play online casino games here. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Read disclaimerShow comments