Treasury Secretary Yellen Privately Lobbies Against Tax Amendment Crypto Industry Wants: Report

Treasury Secretary Yellen Privately Lobbies Against Tax Amendment Crypto Industry Wants: Report

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has reportedly raised objections to lawmakers about the cryptocurrency tax amendment to the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that is supported by the crypto community. The White House subsequently announced its support for a competing amendment. Yellen Exerting Influence on Lawmakers Regarding Crypto Taxation

The new crypto tax proposal in the $1 trillion infrastructure bill has become a topic of intense controversy over the past week.

Two amendments have been put forward so far: one sponsored by Senators Mark Warner, Rob Portman, and Kyrsten Sinema. The other, which has gained the support of the crypto community, is sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden, Cynthia Lummis, and Pat Toomey.

According to Washington Post reporter Jeff Stein, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen spoke with lawmakers Thursday to raise objections to the amendment sponsored by Senators Toomey, Wyden, and Lummis. He tweeted Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has been privately lobbying lawmakers against Wyden-Lummis-Toomey crypto amendment, as White House seeks to fend off push to limit new regulatory authorities.

The cryptocurrency tax proposal in the infrastructure bill comprises two key parts. The first requires payments worth more than $10,000 to be reported to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The second requires crypto “brokers” to file a type of 1099 form for certain kinds of crypto transactions.

The definition of what a crypto broker is in the original proposal includes miners and software developers. This has caused an uproar in the crypto community as miners and software developers do not know who their users are, making it impossible to report to the IRS. Some lawmakers have slammed the original proposal, including Senator Pat Toomey, who said the plan was “unworkable.” The two amendments aim to clarify the definition of a broker.

The crypto industry believes that the Wyden-Lummis-Toomey amendment adequately clarifies what a broker is.

In contrast, the Warner-Portman-Sinema crypto amendment only exempts proof-of-work mining, causing more concerns that the government is now picking winners and losers in innovation. Nonetheless, this amendment has gained support from the White House.

The initial crypto tax plan was crafted by Senator Portman with the help of Treasury Department officials. It is expected to raise approximately $28 billion over 10 years from crypto transactions to help fund the infrastructure package.

Treasury Secretary Yellen has expressed her concerns several times about cryptocurrencies being used in illicit financing. She warned in February: “To the extent it is used, I fear it’s often for illicit finance. It’s an extremely inefficient way of conducting transactions, and the amount of energy that’s consumed in processing those transactions is staggering.”

What do you think about Treasury Secretary Yellen lobbying against the amendment supported by the crypto community? Let us know in the comments section below. Tesla CEO Elon Musk Opposes "Hasty" Cryptocurrency Regulation REGULATION | 8 hours ago US Senator Urges Congress to Stop Treasury From Picking Winners and Losers in Crypto REGULATION | 10 hours ago Tags in this story crypto tax amendment, crypto taxation, cryptocurrency tax, cryptocurrency tax amendment, cynthia lummis, infrastructure bill, Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary, treasury secretary janet yellen

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Read disclaimerShow comments